I do understand this, and how this sort of thing is inevitable in any busy site, but the effect remains the same.S4BRE wrote:it's not that it was ignored, we just dont have some one dedicated to updating the original thread
Though not intentionally ignored, by any decision to do so, the incorrect entry was never modified.
And for all effective purposes this means that the need to correct it was ignored, though not willfully.
My comment was not intended as criticism of anyone, but was merely a reminder that the error remained.
@windrider & bitsbubba:
I see that the correction has now been made, though I'm not sure who did it.
The note at the bottom of that first post states that its last edit was done back in January, by GreeDi... ?!?
(Possibly a site caching effect, I guess.)
The earlier posts about this problem, which I referred to in my own report, were a brief exchange of comments about it on page 4 of this thread, written near the end of October 2011, almost five months ago. (between jafarb21 and bitsbubba)
In any case it's a good thing that the list no longer misleads anyone about that game.
Best regards: Ronald Andersson (aka: dlanor)